Current approaches to identifying driving heterogeneity face challenges in comprehending fundamental patterns from the perspective of underlying driving behavior mechanisms. The concept of Action phases was proposed in our previous work, capturing the diversity of driving characteristics with physical meanings. This study presents a novel framework to further interpret driving patterns by classifying Action phases in an unsupervised manner. In this framework, a Resampling and Downsampling Method (RDM) is first applied to standardize the length of Action phases. Then the clustering calibration procedure including ''Feature Selection'', ''Clustering Analysis'', ''Difference/Similarity Evaluation'', and ''Action phases Re-extraction'' is iteratively applied until all differences among clusters and similarities within clusters reach the pre-determined criteria. Application of the framework using real-world datasets revealed six driving patterns in the I80 dataset, labeled as ''Catch up'', ''Keep away'', and ''Maintain distance'', with both ''Stable'' and ''Unstable'' states. Notably, Unstable patterns are more numerous than Stable ones. ''Maintain distance'' is the most common among Stable patterns. These observations align with the dynamic nature of driving. Two patterns ''Stable keep away'' and ''Unstable catch up'' are missing in the US101 dataset, which is in line with our expectations as this dataset was previously shown to have less heterogeneity. This demonstrates the potential of driving patterns in describing driving heterogeneity. The proposed framework promises advantages in addressing label scarcity in supervised learning and enhancing tasks such as driving behavior modeling and driving trajectory prediction.

Collaborative manipulation is inherently multimodal, with haptic communication playing a central role. When performed by humans, it involves back-and-forth force exchanges between the participants through which they resolve possible conflicts and determine their roles. Much of the existing work on collaborative human-robot manipulation assumes that the robot follows the human. But for a robot to match the performance of a human partner it needs to be able to take initiative and lead when appropriate. To achieve such human-like performance, the robot needs to have the ability to (1) determine the intent of the human, (2) clearly express its own intent, and (3) choose its actions so that the dyad reaches consensus. This work proposes a framework for recognizing human intent in collaborative manipulation tasks using force exchanges. Grounded in a dataset collected during a human study, we introduce a set of features that can be computed from the measured signals and report the results of a classifier trained on our collected human-human interaction data. Two metrics are used to evaluate the intent recognizer: overall accuracy and the ability to correctly identify transitions. The proposed recognizer shows robustness against the variations in the partner's actions and the confounding effects due to the variability in grasp forces and dynamic effects of walking. The results demonstrate that the proposed recognizer is well-suited for implementation in a physical interaction control scheme.

Current approaches to identifying driving heterogeneity face challenges in capturing the diversity of driving characteristics and understanding the fundamental patterns from a driving behaviour mechanism standpoint. This study introduces a comprehensive framework for identifying driving heterogeneity from an Action-chain perspective. First, a rule-based segmentation technique that considers the physical meanings of driving behaviour is proposed. Next, an Action phase Library including descriptions of various driving behaviour patterns is created based on the segmentation findings. The Action-chain concept is then introduced by implementing Action phase transition probability, followed by a method for evaluating driving heterogeneity. Employing real-world datasets for evaluation, our approach effectively identifies driving heterogeneity for both individual drivers and traffic flow while providing clear interpretations. These insights can aid the development of accurate driving behaviour theory and traffic flow models, ultimately benefiting traffic performance, and potentially leading to aspects such as improved road capacity and safety.

Amy works just like a human assistant, except she's not human. It's an AI bot made by X.ai, a company specializing in scheduling assistants that respond to natural language. Amy is so good at what she does that I find myself thanking her for booking a meeting, forgetting she needs no more thanks than my microwave. It's impossible to ignore all the buzz about AI bots. Last month, Facebook's David Marcus announced that over 30,000 bots have been built since the opening of its Messenger app to bot developers in April.

Recently, I needed to book a lunch meeting. To help coordinate, I asked Amy to assist and cc'd her on the email. "Amy," I wrote, "please help us find a time to meet. Let's plan for sushi at Tokyo Express on Spear Street." Amy looked at my calendar, found an open time suitable for everyone invited, and booked the meeting.

Recently, I needed to book a lunch meeting. To help coordinate, I asked Amy to assist and cc'd her on the email. "Amy," I wrote, "please help us find a time to meet. Let's plan for sushi at Tokyo Express on Spear Street." Amy looked at my calendar, found an open time suitable for everyone invited, and booked the meeting.